LooksMeter · Celebrity PSL benchmark
Jordan Barrett PSL Score & Craniofacial Ratio Breakdown
In PSL and looksmaxxing anthropometry, prime Jordan Barrett is the textbook example of compact midface geometry and extreme lateral cheekbone flare. His bizygomatic width relative to his short upper-face height produces an fWHR above 2.0, paired with a pronounced positive canthal tilt and hooded almond orbitals. To see how your own fWHR, midface ratio and canthal tilt compare on the same landmarks, try the free PSL score calculator →
Jordan Barrett's 4-Pillar PSL Scorecard (7.4 / 8.0)
Jordan Barrett places in the True Adam tier (Top 0.005%, roughly 9.6 / 10 on a conventional 1-to-10 scale). Below is how Jordan Barrett's craniofacial structure grades across the four weighted PSL pillars:
| PSL Pillar | Weight | Jordan Barrett's Score | Population Mean | Primary Anatomical Driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facial Harmony | 35% | 7.2 / 8.0 | 4.0 / 8.0 | Midface ratio, vertical thirds & interocular spacing (ESR) |
| Sexual Dimorphism | 25% | 7.1 / 8.0 | 4.0 / 8.0 | Supraorbital rim, bigonial width & lip-to-philtrum balance |
| Bone Angularity | 25% | 7.7 / 8.0 | 4.0 / 8.0 | Zygomatic arch projection, gonial angle & submalar hollow |
| Miscellaneous / Soft Tissue | 15% | 7.4 / 8.0 | 4.0 / 8.0 | Hair framing, brow density, lash contrast & skin clarity |
Jordan Barrett's Craniofacial Ratios (fWHR, Canthal Tilt & Gonial Angle)
Unlike subjective 1-to-10 ratings, PSL anthropometry measures scale-invariant distances and angles between facial landmarks. Here are Jordan Barrett's key craniofacial ratios compared against the adult population average:
| Craniofacial Metric | Jordan Barrett | Population Mean | Structural Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| fWHR (Facial Width-to-Height) | 2.02x | 1.78x - 1.85x | Rare ultra-compact horizontal-to-vertical box |
| Midface Ratio | 1.05x | 0.93x - 1.02x | Short, compact central third |
| Canthal Tilt | +6.0° | +1.0° - +2.5° | Sharp upward medial-to-lateral eye vector |
| Eye Separation Ratio (ESR) | 0.47 | 0.44 - 0.46 | Wide-set orbital spacing supporting cheekbone width |
| Gonial Angle | 119° | 125° - 132° | Acute mandibular corner with high ramus |
| Ogee Curve & Submalar Hollow | Extreme | Moderate | High-set malar prominence with clean buccal shadow |
Primary Facial Halos (Compact Runway Midface & High Zygomatic Arch)
A facial halo is a high-leverage craniofacial feature that elevates the entire face's first impression. Jordan Barrett's signature halos are:
Ultra-compact 1.05 midface ratio and 2.02 fWHR
Wide interpupillary distance combined with a short pupil-to-upper-lip vertical span creates a powerful, youthful central facial box that photographs well at every focal length.
+6° positive canthal tilt with hooded hunter lids
The lateral canthus sits significantly higher than the medial corner, while a low-set brow ridge eliminates upper scleral and tarsal show.
Laterally projecting zygomatic arches
High malar eminence catches overhead light immediately and casts a natural submalar contour line down toward the oral commissures.
Why Jordan Barrett is cited as a 7.4 PSL outlier
Barrett's Angularity pillar (7.7/8.0) sits near the theoretical ceiling of the PSL scale. Where most faces lose points to midface elongation or flat infraorbital support, his maxilla projects forward beneath the eyes, pushing both the lower eyelids and upper lip into alignment.
Camera focal length and midface lessons
Because a 24mm phone selfie artificially stretches the nose and narrows the zygomatic arches, even compact faces can look elongated at close range. Stepping back to 50mm-85mm (or 2x-3x portrait mode) preserves true bizygomatic width.
Frequently asked
What is Jordan Barrett's PSL score?
Prime Jordan Barrett is widely rated around 7.4 out of 8.0 on the PSL scale (True Adam tier), driven by his 2.02 fWHR, 1.05 compact midface ratio and +6 degree positive canthal tilt.
Why does Jordan Barrett's midface look so compact?
His interpupillary distance is wide (ESR ~0.47) while the vertical distance from his pupils to his upper lip is short, yielding a midface ratio near 1.05x compared to the 0.93x-1.00x population average.
Email me the cheat-sheet
Get the cheat-sheet + a first-time member perk
Get our facial harmony & styling reference sheet emailed to you.
More benchmarks & calculators
Henry Cavill (7.2 PSL · True Adam)
7.2 PSL (True Adam): textbook mandibular robustness, 1.94 fWHR and balanced 1:1 midface.
Francisco Lachowski (7.3 PSL · True Adam)
7.3 PSL (7.8 Harmony): the gold standard for balanced facial thirds and broad appeal.
Sean O'Pry (7.45 PSL · True Adam)
7.45 PSL (True Adam): the anatomical reference for hunter eyes and 7.8 Angularity.
David Gandy (7.1 PSL · True Adam)
7.1 PSL (7.8 Dimorphism): rugged supraorbital projection, broad mandible and commanding presence.
Timothée Chalamet (5.9 PSL · Chadlite)
5.9 PSL (Chadlite): elite 6.9 Angularity and hair framing carrying moderate dimorphism.
Cillian Murphy (6.4 PSL · Chad)
6.4 PSL (7.5 Angularity): rare lateral cheekbone flare and razor-cut bigonial corners.
Show 4 more guides
All Celebrity PSL Scores Database
Compare all 18 male & female craniofacial benchmark profiles side by side.
The Full PSL Scale (0.25-8.0)
All 7 tiers, 1-10 conversion chart and the 4 pillars explained.
Free fWHR & Midface Ratio Calculator
Measure your own Facial Width-to-Height Ratio on-device.
Free Gonial Angle Calculator
Measure your mandibular jaw corner angle in degrees from one photo.
Keep reading
The PSL scale, explained (every tier 0.25-8)
Complete 0.25-8.0 PSL scale chart, what a PSL 3-8 face looks like, what PSL stands for, the 1-10 conversion and the 4 categories behind your score.
Facial halos & failos, explained
All 8 facial regions mapped into halos vs failos, why removing one failo beats chasing new halos and the exact non-surgical fix order.
Average PSL score & bell curve study
Why 4.0 is the true 50th-percentile average, how PSL decimals map to percentiles and how lens distance shifts ratios.
This page is general information about facial aesthetics terminology, not medical or cosmetic advice. Scores from our tools are calibrated reads of one photo that describe presentation, never your worth.